Decision-grade detection
Threats surface to the operator with the kind of evidence you can act on — not raw signals, not noise, not single-source guesses. The platform decides what's worth showing.
The same authorization gate, the same audit database, the same friendly-asset registry, the same effect-measurement pipeline. Red team exercises feed blue team improvement. Blue team gaps inform red team scenarios.
Stress-test friendly defenses with the same toolkit a real adversary uses. Authorized. Audited. Reversible. Built for training rotations, capability evaluations, and continuous offensive validation in operational and exercise environments.
Cross-modally corroborated detection and tamper-evident response. Multi-layer authorization. Friendly-asset awareness. Built for soldiers, operators, and security teams who need decision-grade evidence at the moment that matters.
The platform is opinionated. It refuses false binaries between offense and defense, between automation and operator control, between speed and accountability. The capability surface below describes what the operator gets — not how it works.
Threats surface to the operator with the kind of evidence you can act on — not raw signals, not noise, not single-source guesses. The platform decides what's worth showing.
Not "something detected." Threat-class taxonomy with confidence the operator can read at a glance. Built so a soldier under stress doesn't have to interpret raw machine output.
Engagement requires affirmative operator action. The platform won't take active steps the operator didn't authorize. Reversible by physical control.
The platform knows what's friendly before it considers what's hostile. Friendly-asset deconfliction is the floor of every active capability, not an add-on.
When the rules of engagement allow it, the operator can apply effect against confirmed targets. Bounded in time. Bounded in scope. Logged in full.
What did the action actually do? The platform observes the result and brings it back to the operator. No assumption. No hand-waving.
Targets that exceed the platform's envelope hand off cleanly to higher-echelon effectors with the track payload intact. The seam is the platform.
Every operator action and every autonomous decision is captured in a form that can be reconstructed after the fact. Built for organizations that have to answer for what their systems did.
Adversaries are fielding UAS that bypass radio-frequency interdiction entirely. The threat class is real, public, and operational. SafeKey was built to detect platforms that don't broadcast — because the next-generation threat doesn't.
A meaningful share of fielded counter-UAS systems depend on disrupting the radio link. When the adversary removes the radio from the kill chain, those systems lose effectiveness. The threat has already evolved past the architectural assumption that drones broadcast.
A drone is a physical platform regardless of how it's controlled. SafeKey corroborates across multiple sensor modalities and classifies the platform itself — not the radio link. The detection chain proceeds whether the adversary is using a radio, an optical tether, or autonomous navigation.
The platform identifies airframe class from physical signatures, not from link metadata. Operates against threat platforms that publish nothing.
No single sensor decides. Confirmed tracks come from agreement across modalities — robust against decoys, spoofing, and environmental noise.
Threat platforms tethered to a local operator emit other detectable signals. The platform identifies and bounds the source for downstream tasking.
Confirmed tracks integrate with third-party effector systems through standard interfaces. The kill chain does not care which engagement method the rules of engagement permit.
The erosion of radio-frequency interdiction against modern UAS is a deliberate adversarial response to widely-documented counter-UAS doctrine. Architectures that treated the control link as the engagement surface are exposed; architectures that treat the platform itself as the target survive the threat shift. SafeKey was designed for the platform, not the radio.
An operator trained on the handheld can step into the cell or the cloud surface and recognize every concept. Doctrine codified in the cloud propagates back to the dismounted edge. The platform is one product, not three.
Soldier-carried compute and sensing. Operates without backhaul. Engagement decisions at the tactical edge, in the operator's hand.
Self-contained command surface for classified or disconnected environments. Hardened against external dependency or compromise.
Multi-mission oversight, sync, and authorization across distributed handheld units. Available to both defense and commercial customers.
Unified stack. The detection pipeline, audit schema, friendly-asset registry, and engagement gating are identical across all three surfaces. Operators do not retrain. Doctrine does not fork. Audit trails are interoperable.
Designed for the reality of DoW acquisition and high-trust commercial deployment: ITAR registration, Section 889 supply chain, MIL-STD environmental and EMI testing, CMMC L2 self-assessed, and IL5 / IL6 deployment via Azure Government / GovCloud.
Every architectural decision was validated against an acquisition checklist before being implemented. Compliance is a design constraint, not a retrofit.
| Domain | Standard | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Export control | USML Cat XI | ITAR controlled |
| Supply chain | Section 889 | Compliant |
| Environmental | MIL-STD-810H | In progress |
| EMI / EMC | MIL-STD-461G | In progress |
| Cybersecurity | CMMC L2 | Self-assessed |
| Deployment | IL5 / IL6 | GovCloud-ready |
| Intellectual property | USPTO 35 §111(b) | Provisionals filed |
For DoW program offices and operational units, we provide a classified-friendly capability brief and field demonstration.
Request a briefing