Built for the accreditation you actually have to pass.
One codebase, three deployment profiles. A government build is a configuration of the same product rather than a separate line, so what your assessor reviews is one system, not two.
One product, three profiles.
Commercial, DoD, and FedRAMP builds come from the same product. A government build is a configuration of it rather than a separate line, so what your assessor reviews is one system, not two.
The differences between the profiles are enumerable and small. We will walk you through them under agreement rather than publishing a map of them here.
Controls implemented and evidenced.
Built against the control families your assessor will actually test, with the evidence packaged for review. The table states exactly where each item stands.
| Controls | Built against the identity, cryptography, hardening, and key-management families a DoD assessor tests |
|---|---|
| NIST coverage | Mapped across the control families relevant to this class of system |
| Submission package | Prepared for accreditation review |
| Authority to operate | Not granted. No product on this site holds an ATO. |
| Impact level | The space product runs commercial infrastructure and inherits no impact level. |
| Section 889 | Review underway. Not “compliant by design”. |
| Environmental | No environmental qualification testing has been performed. |
| Control evidence | Released under NDA. |
The network you have, not the one in the diagram.
Air-gapped install
Stands up inside a closed network with no reachback to the public internet. A supported path, not a degraded mode.
Inside your boundary
Deploys within the perimeter you already control, so operational data stays where your accreditation already covers it.
Tamper-evident audit
Every consequential action lands in an audit trail built to survive review rather than to reassure a dashboard.
Into the picture you already run
Results land in the common operating picture your team already runs, across every line.
Start with the requirement, not the demo.
For a program office the useful first exchange is a technical data package against your actual requirement text — including a per-bullet self-assessment with the gaps left in. We have written those before and we will write one for you.
Offensive tooling is export-controlled and gated behind review. Expect that conversation to be slower than a commercial one, and expect us to ask who you are.