Three lines. One platform.
Hawk, Vela, and Sentry are not three products that share a logo. They share a core, and the domain-specific work sits on top of it — so what you buy in one line makes the next one cheaper to adopt rather than harder.
The parts that are expensive to buy twice.
Correlation across domains
Activity in one domain can be weighed against activity in another without a bespoke bridge between two vendors' products. A drone near a ground station and an anomaly on the bus are one picture, not two tickets.
One audit trail
The same tamper-evident record across every line. Your assessor learns it once and reviews it once, rather than once per product.
One integration surface
One way in and one way out, however many domains you run. Adding a line does not start another integration project.
One deployment story
The same install paths — managed, self-hosted, air-gapped — across all three lines, with the same boundary and the same keys.
Runs where the mission is, not where the cloud is.
Hosted if you want it operated for you, on your own infrastructure if you want the boundary and the keys, or fully disconnected if the network you actually have does not reach the internet. The same three shapes across all three lines.
Commercial and government builds come from the same product. What differs between them, and how any of it is put together, is covered under agreement.
See it against your own architecture.
The useful conversation is a specific one — your telemetry, your airspace, your model stack. We will walk it against what you already run and tell you where this fits and where it does not.